Blog

Delaware’s Comparative Negligence Rule is an important one to consider when dealing with personal injury claims in Delaware. In general, the rule states that if a plaintiff was injured due to their own negligence, and that negligence played some role in causing their injury, then the defendant can reduce their liability by the amount of the plaintiff’s negligence. This approach has important implications for personal injury cases in Delaware as it

Florida’s Comparative Negligence Rule The state of Florida has adopted a rule of “comparative negligence” in negligence and personal injury cases. This means that when an injured claimant and the defendant are both partially responsible for the injury that occurred, any award of damages to the claimant will be reduced by an amount equal to the claimant’s percentage of fault in the matter. This article will explain what the comparative negligence

The state of Georgia uses a system of comparative negligence when determining the level of fault assigned to each party in the event of an injury or other form of civil case. This system is used to determine any potential financial liability that may be assigned to a party who may or may not have contributed to the incident or injury in some way. The application of the system can vary

Hawaii's Comparative Negligence Rule is a law that uses a unique approach to assess and resolve personal injury cases. Essentially, it permits plaintiffs to collect damages regardless of the amount of fault attributed to them for an incident, unlike the "pure comparative negligence" laws in some other states. The amount of damages awarded is adjusted according to the amount of fault attributed to the injured party. Hawaii's Comparative Negligence Rule is

The state of Idaho follows a legal principle known as Comparative Negligence when determining how much fault each party bears in an accident. The comparative negligence rule states that you can be found partially responsible for an accident and still be able to receive compensation for your damages. This means that if you were partially at fault for an accident, you can still recover a portion of the damages from the

The state of Illinois operates under a comparative negligence rule, which means that when determining damages for an injury, it compares the fault of each party when assigning liability for the incident. It is important for Illinois residents to understand how this law affects them in the event of an injury, and the claims that may be available to pursue relief. What Is Comparative Negligence? Comparative negligence is an area of

The term “comparative negligence” is used by legal professionals to describe a system utilized to determine a plaintiff’s or defendant’s responsibility when both parties are partially at fault for causing an injury or damage to property. While not every state follows the same comparative negligence rule, Indiana follows the Modified Comparative Negligence Rule. Under Indiana's Modified Comparative Negligence Rule, a claimant can only receive damages if the plaintiff’s negligence did not

Iowa's comparative negligence rule is a legal principle used to determine the amount of damages an injured party may be entitled to in a personal injury case. It is based on the idea that both parties to an accident have a responsibility to act in a reasonable, safe manner. This rule seeks to determine how much fault, or "negligence," each party is responsible for and how that should affect their financial

Negligence is a legal concept that deals with fault. Under the law of negligence, a person who causes harm to another can be held liable for any damages incurred by the other person as a result of their negligent behavior. Comparative negligence is a defense that can be used in certain cases to reduce the percentage of liability assigned to any one party. In Kansas, the law of comparative negligence, as

The concept of negligence surrounds many legal issues. Negligence is defined as failure to exercise the degree of reasonable care that an objectively prudent person would exercise in the same or similar circumstances. In tort law, negligence is often used in personal injury and property damage cases. In Kentucky, comparative negligence governs how fault is attributed when two or more parties are involved in a single incident. The notion of “comparative